Does science have to shake things up?

A pointed response from the perspective of the philosophy of science.

© iStock

Our knowledge is growing. It’s like a pile to which scientific research is adding more and more. That is certainly a simple picture of the history of science.

But the picture is wrong, as the philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn (1922—1996) has shown. The foundations of a scientific discipline are constantly being shaken. Even the fundamental assumptions that have been agreed upon are proving problematic. New findings permeate the pile of previous knowledge like shock waves. Around 100 years ago, classical physics was shaken by quantum mechanics. Blurring and quantum leaps called into question the principles we rely on in our day-to-day lives.

Experience suggests that such shocks will continue to occur in the future. But that doesn’t have to be the case everywhere. Science can, but does not have to, shake things up.

About the person

Image: Courtesy of L. Bühler

Claus Beisbart

is a professor at the Institute of Philosophy with a special qualification in philosophy of science and has been at the University of Bern since 2012. Prior to that, he received his doctorate in physics as well as in philosophy. His research interests are the philosophy of science and artificial intelligence. He is a member of the Embedded Ethics Lab at the Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (CAIM).

Subscribe to the uniAKTUELL newsletter

Discover stories about the research at the University of Bern and the people behind it.

Top